Paul A. Hinshaw v. M-C-M Properties, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one of the conveyances was in fee and the other adjacent conveyances were easements
• holding that one of the conveyance was in fee and the other adjacent conveyances were easements
• “The cardinal rule regarding an interpretation of a deed is to ascertain the intention of the parties and to give that intention effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).