Patzner v. Baise

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the claims were for damage to personal property and interference with access to the real property and there was no physical taking of the property, the property owner was not entitled to eminent domain proceedings for compensation; the remedy was a complaint for damages
• where the claims were for damage to personal property and interference with access to the real property and there was no physical taking of the property, the property owner was not entitled to eminent domain proceedings for compensation; the remedy was a complaint for damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).