PATTYE ANNE D'AVAZNA, THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROY LESTER PIPPIN, SR. A/K/A ROY L. PIPPIN, SR. v. CHRISTINA GUZMAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an amusement park with facilities for swimming, boating, miniature golf, and dancing is a “place of entertainment” under Title II
• holding that snack bar’s status as a covered establishment automatically brings the entire surrounding country club facility within the ambit of Title II
• holding that Title II protects from discrimination “spectators,” “listeners,” and “those where entertainment takes the form of direct participation in some sport or activity”
• holding that Title II protects from discrimination “spectators,” “listeners,” and “those where entertainment takes the form of direct participation in some sport or activity”
• concluding that a retail pharmacy was not a covered establishment
• concluding that a retail pharmacy was not a covered establishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).