Patton v. Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “a compelling and extraordinary need to share these common discovery materials with counsel for the same plaintiff in other related litigations against Electrolux, especially in the absence of any discernible prejudice to Electrolux.”
• language of protective order favors modification where “a party is permitted, pursuant to the Protective Order, to challenge a confidentiality designation and is not restricted to a time frame.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).