Skip to main content

Patton v. State

Citations

  • 725 N.E.2d 462
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 313
  • 2000 WL 276965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officer’s testimony was not hearsay because it was offered to explain why a particular course of action was taken during a criminal investigation rather than for the truth of the matter asserted
  • finding children’s out-of-court statements that a man was inside a convenience store admissible to show why the police officer entered the building

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman, Brook, Mattingly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.