Skip to main content
· 6/15/1832

Patton v. McFarlane

Citations

  • 3 Pen. & W. 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[e]ven where there are apt words in an instrument to create a [conditional] limitation, and sufficient for that purpose if they stood alone, yet an examination of all parts of the instrument may lead to the conclusion that a condition subsequent is its obvious purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.