· 1/24/1991
Pattison v. Labor Relations Commission
Citations
- 565 N.E.2d 801
- 30 Mass. App. Ct. 9
- 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2815
- 1991 Mass. App. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff must show that “but for the malpractice, the plaintiff would have succeeded in the action against the third person”
- union’s justification of technical processing failures by employee rejected
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dreben, Kaplan, Porada
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.