Skip to main content
· 1/24/1991

Pattison v. Labor Relations Commission

Citations

  • 565 N.E.2d 801
  • 30 Mass. App. Ct. 9
  • 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2815
  • 1991 Mass. App. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff must show that “but for the malpractice, the plaintiff would have succeeded in the action against the third person”
  • union’s justification of technical processing failures by employee rejected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dreben, Kaplan, Porada

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.