Skip to main content
· 1/8/2003

Patti v. Fred Ehrlich, PC

Citations

  • 304 B.R. 182
  • 49 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1741
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 552
  • 2003 WL 23157457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding debt for attorneys’ fees incurred in obtaining a divorce was primarily for personal or family reasons and therefore a consumer debt
  • disregarding argument that by proceeding, court must have decided applicability of the stay sub silento
  • “A bankruptcy court may redress violations of a stay effective under the authority of 11 U.S.C. § 1301 through the power granted to it under the Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. § 105(a).”
  • state court action to collect divorce legal fees violated codebtor stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.