Patterson v. Yazoo City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state tort claim based on a failure to comply with a premarket approval's monitoring and reporting requirements is not preempted
• stating that “a state-law tort claim based on an alleged violation of a specific premarket approval requirement, [which] links the federal violation to plaintiffs injuries” “successfully threads the needle between Riegel and Buckman”
• taking judicial notice of fact based on “FDA public records” available on the FDA’s website
• dismissing NYGBL § 349 claim where plaintiff “alleges that [defendant] deceived the FDA, but he does not explain how this allegedly improper conduct was ‘consumer- oriented’”
• taking judicial notice of the FDA's public approval of a particular product
• “The Court takes judicial notice of [the FDA’s premarket approval], based on FDA public records available” on its website.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).