Patterson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \claims of entitlement to out-of-state jail credit must be raised in a timely motion under rule 3.850\
• recognizing that \claims of entitlement to out-of-state jail credit must be raised in a timely motion under rule 3.850\
• recognizing that “claims of entitlement to out-of-state jail credit must be raised in a timely motion under rule 3.850”
• holding that a claim of entitlement for out-of-state jail credit must be raised in a rule 3.850 motion (citing Gisi v. State, 135 So.3d 493, 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014))
• holding that because the postconviction court should have treated Patterson’s motion as if it had been filed under rule 3.850, he had to be given an opportunity to amend the motion pursuant to rule 3.850(f)(2) if he could do so in good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Primavera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-26
• KENNETH STEFFEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-06
• Huff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-15
• Steffen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spera v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-01· cited 504×
• State v. McBride
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-05-15· cited 335×
• Garnett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-25· cited 19×
• Gill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-23· cited 10×
• Gisi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-26· cited 9×
• WOMBAUGH v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-22· cited 4×