Patterson v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, at signing, “borrowers were not given a copy of the procedural rules of the National Arbitration Forum (NAF); the rules were sent to the borrowers only once ITT had initiated a claim against them”
• “Two alternative analyses exist under California law for determining whether a contractual provision will be enforceable because it is unconscionable”
• arbitration provisions in loan agreements requiring California consumers to arbitrate in Minnesota were unconscionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).