· 12/8/2009
Patterson v. INDIANA NEWSPAPERS, INCORPORATED
Citations
- 589 F.3d 357
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26692
- 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,746
- 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1697
- 2009 WL 4573706
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that we will enforce district court’s choice to demand strict compliance with local rules governing summary judgment
- “We have repeatedly held that the district court is within its discretion to strictly enforce compliance with its local rules regarding summary-judgment motions.”
- “We have repeatedly held that the district court is within its discretion to strictly enforce compliance with its local rules regarding summary-judgment motions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Flaum, and Sykes, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.