Patterson v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while some of the alleged retaliatory conduct could have also been found violative of the CBA, the plaintiffs claims were not preempted because they “stem[med] from his entitlement under state law”
• “Plaintiff’s LAD claim seeks the enforcement of state anti-discrimination law, which defines the right not to be discriminated against without reference to the terms of the parties’ CBA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).