Patterson v. Booth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the CAB did not err by disregarding the claimant’s treating providers’ opinions when their conclusions were primarily based on the unreliable narrative of the 6 claimant
• board’s de novo review does not confer upon non-appealing parties the right to pursue their claims on appeal before the board; nor can board rule on issues that were “not raised at the department of labor hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).