Patriot Systems, Inc. v. C-Cubed Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant’s passive website did not support the exercise of personal jurisdiction
• finding no nexus because, although plaintiffs claims related to licensing and royalty agreements between parties, the claims did not arise from those agreements
• acknowledging that websites are analyzed through a spectrum analysis
• “In the court’s view, defendant’s act of entering into contracts with the federal government in Washington, D.C. to be performed in Virginia does not indicate defendant has purposefully availed itself of the benefits and privileges of conducting business in Utah.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).