Patrick W. Donahue v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that ALJ may rely on unchallenged YE testimony that conflicted with DOT
• holding that an ALJ may prefer the testimony of a vocational expert over the conclusions in the DOT, and vice versa
• ruling that the ALJ may rely on unchallenged VE testimony that conflicted with DOT
• ruling that ALJ may rely on unchallenged VE testimony that conflicted with DOT
• holding that a claimant must raise any objections at the hearing
• explaining that expert can “give a bottom line, provided that the underlying data and reasoning are available on demand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).