Patrick v. Rivera-Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(c) motions “are ordinarily accorded much the same treatment”
• noting that an untimely motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) should be treated as a motion pursuant to Rule 12(c)
• noting that the district court’s reliance on the wrong rule of civil procedure was “inconsequential” because the standard of review for both motions is the same
• reversing summary judgment as to two officers because they were 21 aware of the plaintiffs’ detention and witnessed at least part of the arrest and beating at issue
• determining parents’ rights under law of child’s country of habitual residence
• a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, filed “long after the deadline for responsive pleadings” is untimely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).