Patrick v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying this test in determining the constitutional propriety of a jury instruction
• “[It] is the duty of the jury to consider the instructions as a whole . . . .” (alteration in original) (quoting Rollston v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 535, 541 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
• Portuondo v. Agard
  Supreme Court· 2000-03-06· cited 329×
• Rollston v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-01-02· cited 287×
• Darnell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-07-05· cited 237×
• Swisher v. Swisher & Craun
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1982-04-30· cited 144×
• Gaines v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-01-14· cited 95×
• Banks v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-09-30· cited 60×
• Bennefield v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-02-27· cited 38×
• Walshaw v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-10-12· cited 25×
• Pollino v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-01-13· cited 21×
• Henry v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-06-13· cited 21×
• Johnson v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1988-09-23· cited 14×
• Jordan v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-09-04· cited 11×
• Hazel v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-02-01· cited 6×