Patrick v. Burget

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding hospital peer-review committees failed to meet the requirements of the supervision prong because private parties exercising decision-making authority were not subject to state supervision
• holding hospital peer-review committees failed supervision prong because private parties exercising decision-making authority were not subject to state supervision
• suggesting that state supervision reinforces requirement that anticompetitive behavior at issue be consistent with the state's deliberate policy
• holding hospital peer-review committees failed supervision prong because private parties exercising decision-making authority were not subject to state supervision
• holding hospital peer-review committees failed to meet the requirements of the supervision prong because private parties exercising decision-making authority were not subject to state supervision
• stating that without active state supervision, “there is no realistic assurance that a private party’s anticompetitive conduct promotes state policy, rather than merely the party’s individual interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).