Skip to main content
· 1/19/2005

Patrick v. Allen

Citations

  • 355 F. Supp. 2d 704
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 737
  • 2005 WL 94932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to apply business judgment rule where complaint adequately alleged that defendants were interested
  • denying motion to dismiss waste claim when \neither the Complaint nor the documents incorporated therein dictate[d] that the [transaction alleged to constitute waste was] consistent with the corporate purpose of [the company]\
  • “New York’s business judgment rule creates a presumption that a corporation’s directors aet-:in good faith and in the best interests of the corporation” unless the director has an interest in a decision.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pauley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.