Patrick Held v. Robert T. Held, Sr., Individually and as Trustee of Bodee Investment Trust Municipal Bond Portfolio of Patrick Held

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a written letter submitted as evidence of an express trust was not “other evidence of indebtedness” because it did not contain all of the essential elements of a trust agreement
• finding that a written letter submitted as evidence of an express trust was not “other evidence of indebtedness” because it did not contain all of the essential elements of a trust agreement
• “[M]ost courts have permitted the prevailing party to recover the fee charged by the court reporter for his or her ‘appearance.’”
• “[E]ven though [court reporter attendance] fees are not specifically mentioned in the statute, the district court may award them in its discretion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920(2).”
• “As for the deposition attendance fees charged by the court reporter, we have previously held that even though these fees are not specifically mentioned in the statute, the district court may award them in its discretion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920(2).”
• “As for the deposition attendance fees charged by the court reporter, we have previously held that even though these fees are not specifically mentioned in the statute, the district court may award them in its discretion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).