Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 10/21/2020

Patrick Gage v. Reed Richardson

Citations

  • 978 F.3d 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no prejudice when the new witness testimony does not undermine the trial testimony that the assaults occurred
  • declining to analyze deficient performance because the state appellate court “did not unreasonably apply Strickland’s prejudice prong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: St__Eve

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Patrick Gage v. Reed Richardson

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.