Patrick Brian Crawford v. Robert C. Garnier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding statements properly admitted under Ruie 801(d)(2)(D) where party-opponent acknowledged that declarant was a subordinate
• holding statements properly admitted under Rule 801(d)(2)(D) where party-opponent acknowledged that declarant was a subordinate
• affirming district court's admission into evidence of nonparty's out-of-court instructions \which carried no hearsay implications\
• $5,000 award for \emotional pain and suffering\ affirmed since plaintiff's testimony was \sufficient proof of his injury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).