Skip to main content
· 3/27/2014

Patricia Young v. Norva L. Achenbauch

Citations

  • 136 So. 3d 575
  • 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 165
  • 2014 WL 1239965
  • 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1029

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a lawyer may not drop a preexisting client in favor of a new client where the representation of both clients constitutes a conflict, i.e., the “hot potato” rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polston, Pariente, Quince, Canady, Labarga, Perry, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.