· 3/27/2014
Patricia Young v. Norva L. Achenbauch
Citations
- 136 So. 3d 575
- 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 165
- 2014 WL 1239965
- 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1029
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a lawyer may not drop a preexisting client in favor of a new client where the representation of both clients constitutes a conflict, i.e., the “hot potato” rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Polston, Pariente, Quince, Canady, Labarga, Perry, Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.