Patricia Toben v. Bridgestone Retail Operations

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that he district court had not abused its wide discretion when denying a party’s Rule 56(d) motion
• noting that district courts have wide discretion in handling discovery matters
• stating that district courts have wide discretion in handling discovery matters
• “As discussed, this finding misconstrues Toben’s complaint, which includes the allegation that the shop supply fee is wholly unrelated to any supplies or services Bridgestone provides.”
• a district court has wide discretion in ruling on Rule 56(d) motions and our review is for an abuse of discretion
• “As a general rule, summary judgment is proper ‘only after the nonmovant has had adequate time for discovery.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).