Patricia Peele v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we may “‘affirm the district court’s [decision] on any ground supported by the Record(citation omitted
• holding that an employee similarly situated is one who is directly comparable in all material respects
• concluding that employee whose job performance was repeatedly criticized was not meeting employer’s legitimate job expectations, despite evidence that, at one point, employee had received positive performance reviews
• holding that 18 months’ worth of poor-performance warnings showed that the employee was not meeting expectations
• holding that we may “ ‘affirm the district court’s [decision] on any ground supported by the Record . . . .’ ”
• concluding that employee whose job performance was repeatedly criticized was not meeting employer’s legitimate job expectations, despite evidence that, at one point, employee had received positive performance reviews

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).