Patricia Murray v. New York University College of Dentistry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that student's request for \help\, without mentioning sexual nature of harassing conduct, did not give school constructive notice of sexual harassment
• stating that Title VII standards should be applied in determining a university’s liability for a student’s claim of sexual harassment under Title IX
• holding in Title IX action that university did not have constructive knowledge of sexual harassment where student failed to notify university that harassment continued following reprimand of harasser
• “In reviewing claims of discrimination brought under Title IX by employees, whether for sexual harassment or retaliation, courts have generally adopted the same legal standards that are applied to such claims under Title VII.”
• employer may be held liable for co-worker or non- supervisory harassment if it “either provided no reasonable avenue for complaint or knew of the harassment but did nothing about it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).