Patricia M. Pivirotto v. Innovative Systems, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that female employee's replacement by another woman may have \some evidentiary force\ in refuting sex discrimination claim
• holding that certain “insensitive remarks” could not support a finding of Title VII liability because the remarks did not give rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination
• holding that it is error \to require a plaintiff to prove that she was replaced by someone outside her class in order to make out a prima facie case\
• holding that the protected or non-protected status of a replacement employee in wrongful termination cases is not a determinative factor in answer to whether a plaintiff has established a prima facie case
• holding that the protected or non-protected status of a replacement employee in wrongful termination cases is not a determinative factor in answer to whether a plaintiff has established a prima facie case
• holding that “it is inconsistent with Title VII to require a plaintiff to prove that she was replaced by someone outside her class in order to make out a prima facie case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).