Patricia Kennedy & Co. v. Zam-Cul Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a claim for conversion in Massachusetts requires an allegation that “personal tangible property” was taken by the defendant
• separating claim into defendant’s alleged use, and defendant’s conduct, and finding part of claim concerning use preempted by Copyright Act
• decision on motion for reconsideration of preemption ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).