Skip to main content
· 5/1/2015

Patricia Hood v. Gilster-Mary Lee Corporation

Citations

  • 785 F.3d 263
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7241
  • 2015 WL 1951924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]he Seventh Circuit notes two ways plaintiffs can meet their burden: (1) affidavit evidence or statistically significant surveys showing two-thirds of the class members are local citizens, or (2) redefine the class as only local citizens”
  • rejecting the use of last-known addresses to establish the citizenship of class members and adopting the Seventh Circuit’s reasoning from In re Sprint
  • “Any doubt about the applicability of the local-controversy exception is resolved against the party seeking remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Colloton, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.