Patricia A. Luna v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• district court erred by follow- ing recent decision of intermediate state court that departed from state supreme court precedent
• “[T]he district court should not be making contrary [state-law] predictions when this court has ruled squarely on the matter.”
• \[T]he district court should not be making contrary predictions [about state law] when [the Seventh Circuit] has ruled squarely on the matter.\
• “[T]he district court should not be making contrary predictions when this court has ruled squarely on the matter.”
• “The district court had subject-matter jurisdiction because [plaintiff] brought her claim under the FTCA, which is to say she presented the district court with a federal question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).