Patraka v. Armco Steel Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that work completed earlier was still subject to inspection after the relevant date of repose
• allowing relation back where amended complaint added new party even though Pennsylvania law would have barred the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).