Skip to main content
· 8/20/1985

Patlex Corporation v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff

Citations

  • 771 F.2d 480
  • 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 985
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • outlining factors to be analyzed when determining a due process violation, the first of which is “the private interest that will be affected by the official action”
  • rejecting argument that this fee structure “unlawfully weight[ed] the [US]PTO’s initial decision in favor of granting reexamination, because only if reexamination [wa]s granted w[ould] the PTO avoid refunding $1,200 of the $1,500 fee for reexamination”
  • rejecting argument that this fee structure “unlawfully weight[ed] the [US]PTO’s initial decision in favor of granting reexamination, because only if reexamination [wa]s granted w[ould] the PTO avoid refunding $1,200 of the $1,500 fee for reexamination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Friedman, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.