Patino v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that clerk’s defaults are not independently appealable
• dismissing an appeal of a nonfinal order denying the appellant’s motion to vacate a clerk’s default because the provision under rule 9.130 that had permitted such an appeal was deleted, effective January 1, 2001
• dismissing an appeal of a nonfinal order denying the appellant’s motion to vacate a clerk’s default because the provision under rule 9.130 that had permitted such an appeal was deleted, effective January 1, 2001
• “Appellant, therefore, may challenge the default and the order denying vacation of that default on plenary appeal of the final judgment entered below.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).