Paterson v. Brafman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding: “The fact that this was an alternative holding of the court does not detract from its binding authority”
• explaining the fact a holding was alternative does not detract from its authority
• explaining the fact a holding was alternative does not detract from its authority
• “The fact that this was an alternative holding of the court does not detract from its binding authority.” (citing Clemons v. Flagler Hosp., Inc., 385 So. 2d 1134, 1136 n.3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980))
• “Our reversal is founded upon the basic, irrefutable principle that those who subsequently deal with real property are placed on constructive notice of the relevant contents of a properly recorded instrument ....” (citing section 695.11, Florida Statutes)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).