Skip to main content
· 6/27/2003

Paternity of V.M. v. Moore

Citations

  • 790 N.E.2d 1005
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 1197
  • 2003 WL 21489118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court's order that the presumption in favor of the father having custody was rebutted by the grandparent and that the children's best interests were served by continued placement with the grandparent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Mattingly-May, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.