Paternity of H.H. v. Hughes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that paternity affidavits executed by a man and woman who both knew that the man was not the biological father of the child cannot be set aside under the statute
• finding mother estopped from challenging father’s paternity when she executed paternity affidavit despite both parents’ knowledge that the father was not the child’s biological father
• where legal father signed paternity affidavit knowing he was not the biological father of child, setting aside his status as child’s legal father many years later was not in the best interest of child, legal father, or the State
• review of motion to correct error includes review of underlying order
• review of motion to correct error includes review of underlying order
• review of motion to correct error includes review of underlying order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).