Skip to main content
· 5/10/2010

Patent Rights Protection Group, LLC v. Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.

Citations

  • 603 F.3d 1364
  • 95 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1179
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9464
  • 2010 WL 1838647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that jurisdictional discovery is reviewed under the law of the regional circuit because it is an issue not unique to patent law
  • noting that the Federal Circuit applies the law of the regional circuit when reviewing a district court’s discovery rulings in patent cases
  • finding the exercise-of specific jurisdiction fair and not particularly onerous where the defendants admitted presence at numerous trade shows in the forum state
  • finding the exercise of specific jurisdiction fair and not particularly onerous where the defendants admitted presence at numerous trade shows in the forum state
  • “Because patent infringement is a matter of federal law, ‘the shared interest of the several States in furthering fundamental substantive social policies’ is not implicated.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Archer, Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.