Skip to main content
· 3/30/1995

PATELL INDUS. MACH. v. Toyoda MacHinery USA

Citations

  • 880 F. Supp. 96
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a question of fact whether in peculiar knowledge where substantial cost to fly out to inspect machinery and inspection might not have disclosed problem

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scullin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.