· 3/30/1995
PATELL INDUS. MACH. v. Toyoda MacHinery USA
Citations
- 880 F. Supp. 96
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a question of fact whether in peculiar knowledge where substantial cost to fly out to inspect machinery and inspection might not have disclosed problem
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scullin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.