Skip to main content
· 10/17/1991

Patel v. Lutheran Medical Center, Inc.

Citations

  • 775 F. Supp. 592
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14936
  • 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,503
  • 1991 WL 212781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The same standard applies to motions on the ground of newly discovered evidence whether they are made under Rule 59 or Rule 60(b)(2
  • “Under Rules 59(e) and 60(b)(2) evidence which was ‘in the possession of the party before the judgment was rendered is not newly discovered and does not entitle him to relief.’” (citation and alterations omitted)
  • “Under Rules 59(e) and 60(b)(2) evidence which was in the possession of the party before the judgment was rendered . . . is not newly discovered and does not entitle him to relief.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.