Skip to main content
· 6/3/1991

Patel v. California

Citations

  • 500 U.S. 952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a mere allegation of a civil rights conspiracy without factual specificity is insufficient to support a claim
  • “It is a fundamental and well established principle of law ... that statutes are presumed to operate prospectively unless retroactive application appears from the plain language of the legislation”
  • both limiting retroactive application of legislation based on considerations of fairness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.