Pate v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “Cincinnati, Peru and Chicago Railway Co.” and “Chicago Railroad Company” were “the equivalents, each of the other, and had reference to, and were intended to designate the same corporation.”
• determining that 7 “Cincinnati, Peru and Chicago Railway Co.” and “Chicago Railroad Company” were “the equivalents, each of the other, and had reference to, and were intended to designate the same corporation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).