Pate v. Pate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating an action to impose a “constructive trust is governed by the six-year statute of limitations of CPLR 213(1), which started to run from the date the defendants allegedly repudiated the agreement to transfer the subject property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Malmsteen v. BERDON, LLP
  S.D. New York· 2007-03-20· cited 26×
• Coombs v. Jervier
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-06-01· cited 24×
• Soscia v. Soscia
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-12-26· cited 17×
• Ackerman v. Ackerman
  S.D. New York· 2012-12-13· cited 3×
• McGovern v. Solomon
  S.D. New York· 2006-12-26· cited 2×
• Babu v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-04-20· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sitkowski v. Petzing
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-08-05· cited 39×
• Park Associates v. Crescent Park Associates, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-03-02· cited 29×
• Krauss v. Iliescu
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-03-01· cited 5×
• Serrone v. Jamaica Hospital
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-05-19· cited 2×
• Hersh v. Busman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-03-09· cited 1×