Pate v. Marathon Steel Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing that state’s counterpart to Federal Rule 54(b) and Md. Rule 2-602
• \Utah's Rule 54(b) is modeled after and is identical in all material respects to the corresponding federal rule.\
• to be a final order for purposes of rule 54(b), order must \wholly dispose[] of one or more ... claims or parties in the action\
• to be a final order for purposes of rule 54(b), order must “wholly dispose[ ] of one or more ... claims or parties in the action”
• relying on authorities interpreting Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).