Skip to main content
· 12/30/2005

Pate v. Guy

Citations

  • 934 So. 2d 1070
  • 2005 WL 3557417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial court’s order of 24 hours’ incarceration for failure to comply with visitation order was in the nature of a criminal-contempt finding
  • \[S]anctions for civil contempt . . . may continue indefinitely until the contemnor performs as ordered.\
  • because pertinent action concerned child visitation, not support, attorney-fee award was not proper
  • because pertinent action concerned child visitation, not support, attorney-fee award was not proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.