Pastrana v. Hudock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing the standards in Spencer and Archer and noting that “Spencer was specifically based on contract principles”
• disregarding factual statements in parties’ briefs that are irrelevant to issues on appeal
• “[W]e will not search the record for evidence to support allegations of error.”
• “[W]e will not search the record for evidence to support allegations of error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).