Pastrana Ortiz v. Hospital San Francisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• as cited in Blount Bros. Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct.Cl. 478, 495-96, 346 F.2d 962, 975 (1965)
• as cited in Blount Bros. Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct.Cl. 478, 495-96, 346 F.2d 962, 975 (1965)
• a patent ambiguity is “an obvious error in drafting, a gross discrepancy, or an inadvertent but glaring gap”
• disapproved on other grounds, United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc., 384 U.S. 424, 430-31 n. 6, 86 S.Ct. 1539, 1543 n. 6, 16 L.Ed.2d 662 (1966)
• “Although the potential contractor may have some duty to inquire about a major patent discrepancy, or obvious omission, or a drastic conflict in provisions, he is not normally required (absent a clear warning in the contract
• finding an “inadvertent, but glaring gap ____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).