Passalacqua v. Naviant, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer failed to demonstrate a legitimate business interest in specialized training where the training program consisted of “two to three hours on each of two consecutive days” and a review of a manual and “generic” sales tactics
• finding no pro-tectable interest training where employees had prior experience in making cold call sales and testified that the company’s sales tactics were generic
• reversing a temporary injunction where no confidential data or unique or proprietary material, method or technique was identified to justify the restriction
• finding no legitimate interest where “not one such customer was named in the complaint, the motion[,] or any exhibits filed”
• finding no legitimate interest where employer failed to “articulate how any activity, method or technique utilized by [the company] was unique or proprietary in any way”
• vacating a pre- liminary injunction predicated on the defendants’ solicitation of the plaintiff’s customers because “not one such customer was named in the complaint, the motion[,] or any exhibits filed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).