Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Alaska Supreme Court· 6/7/2019

Pasley v. Pasley

Citations

  • 442 P.3d 738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming monthly drug testing and new substance abuse evaluation as visitation conditions
  • “Where the trial court makes factual findings that, as here, are supported by the record, we do not reweigh the conflicting evidence.”
  • “Where the trial court makes factual findings that, as here, are supported by the record, we do not reweigh the conflicting evidence.”
  • “Assets acquired by one spouse before marriage, property acquired by gift, and property acquired by inheritance are . . . separate assets.”
  • “No error in either the admission or the exclusion of evidence” may be used to disturb a judgment “unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice.”
  • “Because a spouse’s actual intent at the time of [a transaction] may conflict with the spouse’s interests at the time of the divorce trial, ‘the trial testimony of the parties must be viewed with careful skepticism.’ ” (footnote omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Pasley v. Pasley

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.