Skip to main content
· 8/27/1982

Pashak v. Barish

Citations

  • 450 A.2d 67
  • 303 Pa. Super. 559
  • 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5090

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff was not entitled to recovery because the right to such recoveiy was entirely speculative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Beck, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.